Geriatric Screening, Triage Urgency, and 30-Day Mortality in Older Emergency Department Patients

BACKGROUND Urgency triage in the emergency department (ED) is important for early identification of potentially lethal conditions and extensive resource utilization. However, in older patients, urgency triage systems could be improved by taking geriatric vulnerability into account. We investigated the association of geriatric vulnerability screening in addition to triage urgency levels with 30-day mortality in older ED patients. DESIGN Secondary analysis of the observational multicenter Acutely Presenting Older Patient (APOP) study. SETTING EDs within four Dutch hospitals. PARTICIPANTS Consecutive patients, aged 70?years or older, who were prospectively included. MEASUREMENTS Patients were triaged using the Manchester Triage System (MTS). In addition, the APOP screener was used as a geriatric screening tool. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Comparison was made between mortality within the geriatric high- and low-risk screened patients in every urgency triage category. We calculated the difference in explained variance of mortality by adding the geriatric screener (APOP) to triage urgency (MTS) by calculating Nagelkerke R2. RESULTS We included 2,608 patients with a median age of 79 (interquartile range = 74-84) years, of whom 521 (20.0%) patients were categorized as high risk according to geriatric screening. Patients were triaged on urgency as standard (27.2%), urgent (58.5%), and very urgent (14.3%). In total, 132 (5.1%) patients were deceased within a period of 30?days. Within every urgency triage category, 30-day mortality was threefold higher in geriatric high-risk compared to low-risk patients (overall = 11.7% vs 3.4%; P

Overview publication

TitleGeriatric Screening, Triage Urgency, and 30-Day Mortality in Older Emergency Department Patients
Date1 August 2020
Issue nameJournal of the American Geriatrics Society
Issue number68: 1755-1762
AuthorsBlomaard LC, Speksnijder C, Lucke JA, de Gelder J, Anten S, Schuit SC, Steyerberg EW, Gussekloo J, de Groot B & Mooijaart SP
Read Read publication